Report: 97% of downtown apartments occupied

As the exodus from the new ghettos of suburbia continues, downtown is filling at a wild rate. According to a new report by Condo Vultures, of the 21,000 units that have come online in the past five years, a mere 800 remain empty and available for rent, yielding a 97% occupancy rate. Pretty impressive for an area that most people felt would immediately melt down into Terminator 2-style ruins.

Comments disabled
There are 12 comments about this post:
I think the great deals you can find in Downtown right now has a lot to do why they are filling up quickly. I'll tell you, I was walking around Downtown one Saturday at 2 p.m. and there were actually people walking around -- and they weren't homeless! They were yuppies! I don't know where they were going seeing how nothing was open.
Ghost of Miami Nights Past
Buying their first dose of crack, perhaps. "Everyone's doing it! It's so urban!"
pop lock and drop it
So that means there are a bunch of buildings not included in this report because they're not constructed/opened? The report says all these condos exist between the Rickenbacker and the Tuttle (with most vacancies being in the Brickell area). The deals are shitty too, at least for anything that's not a two-bedroom: "The median price for a studio is $1,400 per month for a 485 square foot unit". Awful. I moved out of the area about 4 months ago, and I just don't believe there's 97% occupancy. In all the newly or recently opened buildings I would only see about 40-50% of the units with lights on. The only two conclusions I can draw from that are: 1) the Amish have moved to downtown 2) there's not 97% occupancy.
Rocking the balls and ass of the blogging world.
I'm 2 blocks north of the Tuttle in a studio and pay half of that $1400. There's some free studios in my building if any of you guys are interested.
When I lived in midtown I was paying $750/mo for a studio. Duran actually moved into the unit when I vacated, by random coincidence. Honestly, that place should have gone for $600/mo max. I know they say "location, location, location" for real estate, but that building is older than my grandmother and in worse shape. And she's been dead for 5 years. If I move back to downtown, it would probably be by splitting a 2-bedroom place in one of the new buildings. A 3bd/2ba house for $1400 just came on the market two blocks from my current place. Tempting.
Rocking the balls and ass of the blogging world.
"Pretty impressive for an area that most people felt would immediately melt down into Terminator 2-style ruins."

that statement is gold!! lol
tl;dr

Anyway, has to be bullshit. My friend is at the Met One and there's only 15 people in the entire building. I can't believe it's the only building to suffer from such occupancy rates.
"Ahh, she's built like a steakhouse, but she handles like a bistro."
Um Jsand, I pay below $750... you got ripped.
Ghost of Miami Nights Past
She could afford to lower it when I essentially left $1500 in her pocket on moving out (I paid April's rent and moved out 4 days into April, and she kept my deposit). She posts an ad on craigslist every week. She's asking $800/mo now. I don't care about the economics of real estate, but 400 sq. ft. in a poorly maintained building from the 1920s doesn't command that type of rent no matter where it's located.
Rocking the balls and ass of the blogging world.
Are you saying that Duran lives in a dump?
a couple friends of mine just moved into the place across from the arena and next to pawn shop. the apartments are big and have great views...as long as you don't look down at the bums. just keep your eye on the horizon.
xo
CarStar*

Check out our new Facebook page maker.